Thank you Samuel, thats great.
Just a couple of points for clarification please.
1) I'm trying to interpret your license agreement, and I'm stuck on point 7:
"The Product's Commercial License can be purchased for your client as a
stand-alone application. Stand-alone application means that The Product is used as is, without modification of any kind to the source code, without repackaging of any kind, and is installed one instance per license purchased for your client. If you bundle The Product with other software or services
with any modification to the The Product's source code as part of your business offering, you will need to obtain the
un-branded license."
If I wanted to include the 10 latest posts for a particular topic within my clients website (read only, link out to the forum for full access), does this fall under the unbranded license? Also, if I wanted to tie up my site membership with the forum membership, maybe by replicating the forum membership form within the main site? I've quite happy to keep your branding/copywrite on the bottom of the pages, just trying to figure out what you mean by "standalone application" and "any modification to the ... source code".
2) I think you misunderstood the third question in my original post. As a developer, am I going to have to buy a seperate license each time I get a new client who needs a forum? Each client will require their own database and website, and while its not a problem to get the client to pay for an instance of the software, I wouldn't want to have to buy a full license for development purposes. The development server is purely for internal purposes, we don't run websites from it for external viewing, only for development and then bug fixing.
3) And finally, sorry for the pedantry, but in your email you said:
"About URL’s: ... Of course, I am asking you to have all the URLs ready when you purchase, just whenever you have them."
Is there a "not" missing from the first part of the sentence, as in "I am not asking you to have all the URLs ready..."? Its just that when I read it back its kind of bi-meaning if you get my drift...
Thanks again Samuel, we're really close now...